 "Misuse of natl flag, emblem: HC dismisses PIL against AAP")
The Bombay High Court today dismissed a case against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and its leader Arvind Kejriwal for allegedly misusing the national flag and emblem to gain political mileage.
A division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice M S Sanklecha dismissed the PIL filed by one Ram Samudre after AAP filed an affidavit stating it was not using the national flag and emblem ever since it joined politics.
The petition had sought a direction to the political party and its members not to misuse the flag and emblem.
"The respondents have been using the national flag and emblem to gain political mileage. This is a violation under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act and the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act," the petition said.
AAP in its affidavit, however, said it had stopped using the flag and emblem since December 2013 when the Election Commission of India had raised an objection on the issue.
The high court accepted the affidavit and observed that no further case is made out to entertain the PIL and dismissed it.
A division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice M S Sanklecha dismissed the PIL filed by one Ram Samudre after AAP filed an affidavit stating it was not using the national flag and emblem ever since it joined politics.
The petition had sought a direction to the political party and its members not to misuse the flag and emblem.
Also Read
Samudre had claimed that AAP was using the national flag and emblem on its websites and during rallies and was trying to pass it off as its party symbol.
"The respondents have been using the national flag and emblem to gain political mileage. This is a violation under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act and the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act," the petition said.
AAP in its affidavit, however, said it had stopped using the flag and emblem since December 2013 when the Election Commission of India had raised an objection on the issue.
The high court accepted the affidavit and observed that no further case is made out to entertain the PIL and dismissed it.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
SAVE 25%
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Subscribe
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors
Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share
Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor
Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements
Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
SAVE 25%