TV channels misread early trends

Image
Akshat KaushalUrvi Malvania New Delhi/Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 09 2015 | 12:41 AM IST
For the first two hours of the vote count, a National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government looked certain in Bihar, as television channels showed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leading in most constituencies. News anchors congratulated NDA party leaders as firecrackers went off outside party offices.

However, much of this changed around 10 am as the tide seemed to shift away from the NDA and towards the Janata Dal-Rashtriya Janata Dal alliance. The festivities disappeared and NDA leaders began singing a different tune.

As the results began to flow, it emerged that some of the television channels had not only got the exit polls wrong but also missed to read how the election unfolded on Sunday. According to experts, the television channels got the trend wrong as most of them relied on a single agency for data. This agency supplies data ahead of the Election Commission, which makes it preferable for news channels. According to these experts, the agency relied on postal ballots, which tend to favour a national party over regional parties.

Yogendra Yadav, a psephologist and a panelist on a show anchored by Roy, said, "This sort of discrepancy is a first." According to Yadav, the local channels had got the results right, but the national channels got it wrong as they were dependent on a 'consortium', which showed results in BJP's favour.

Rajdeep Sardesai, consulting editor, India Today Group, believes that precaution is the best remedy in such a situation. "I maintained from 8.30 am not to go by early trends. The initial trends are based on postal ballots and so it's like calling a (cricket) match based on the first couple of overs. I said on-air as well that once bitten, twice shy. Let's not predict based on first round and postal ballot as some (channels) tried to do it in UP (elections) in 2012. I called the election at 9.55 am that Nitish will win. I, in fact ended up at times contradicting our screen numbers because I was constantly referring to information from local channels which have stringers at polling booths."
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 09 2015 | 12:24 AM IST

Next Story