In a detailed note to the ministry, the central bank had highlighted concerns related to governance in PSBs, adding these had led to a rise in non-performing assets (NPAs). RBI has also said government ownership led to hurdles in the operations of these banks.
In its reply to the central bank, the previous regime at the finance ministry said the rise in NPAs was primarily due to slowing economic activity.
According to the ministry’s communication to the central bank, PSBs were asked to boost lending at a time when private and foreign lenders had almost stopped lending to sectors such as infrastructure. Loans to sectors towards which there was heavy lending had turned bad. “The ministry said the credit targets for PSBs were revised to fill the gap created by private and foreign players,” central banking sources said.
RBI felt the government should withdraw nominees from bank boards and the government shouldn’t appoint chief executives in banks.
The central bank’s observations to the ministry were also reflected in the report of the P J Nayak committee on governance in banks. The report had recommended a complete overhaul of the PSB structure and asked the government to cut its stake in PSBs to less than 51 per cent.
Though RBI’s letter to the ministry highlighted the importance of autonomy in PSBs, the autonomy was contingent upon the government reducing its stake. Apparently, the ministry hadn’t respondent to these observations of the central bank.
“Especially at a time when the government has to resort to borrowing for infusing capital and maintaining stake in PSBs, it is worth debating why the government of India’s stakes need to be at such elevated levels,” RBI’s letter to the ministry had said.
The Nayak committee suggested the government give up its control on state-run banks. All existing laws governing these lenders, such as the Nationalisation Act and the State Bank of India Act should be repealed and a bank should only be governed by the Companies Act; the government should transfer all its stake and powers to a separate entity, known as the bank investment company, the panel had said.
Sources indicate the ministry is studying the recommendations of the Nayak committee and is forming its opinion on these.
The Nayak panel also recommended the government cut its stake below in PSBs to 50 per cent so that there was restoration of a level playing field for these banks in matters of vigilance enforcement, employee compensation and the applicability of the Right to Information.
The panel had suggested a three-phased transition for PSBs, which would take two to three years.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)