Interpretations on life claim rejection clause vary

Section 45 in new Bill says no claim can be repudiated after three years of policy being in force

Image
M Saraswathy Mumbai
Last Updated : Dec 07 2015 | 12:02 PM IST
The insurance Act passed in 2015, which contained provisions for no life insurance claim rejection after three years, has now led to different interpretations being made by insurers. While many are looking at it retrospectively from 2012, others are looking it at from the date of passage of the ordinance.

Section 45 of the Act says no claim can be repudiated after three years of the policy coming in force. Even if there is a misrepresentation of facts, claims cannot be rejected. Life insurers had sought clarifications from the regulator Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) on whether premium would be refunded for a policy that has run for more than three years and acquired paid-up value results in claim within three years from the date of last revival and it is found that there was suppression of material facts at the time of issuance of policy.

Vighnesh Shahane, chief executive officer, IDBI Federal Life Insurance, said they were following the section from the date of passage of the Ordinance, that is from  December 24, 2014. Hence, he said all claims were being treated according to the new law, irrespective of the issuance date.

Hence, the claims guarantee norms would undergo a change. Shahane said their eight-day claims guarantee still continued and they would pay eight per cent interest on death claim amount for delay beyond eight working days.

“We have made a minor change – earlier, this guarantee was not applicable to death claims arising within two years of issuance, commencement or revival of policy or addition/deletion of any rider; now we have increased this cap to three years,” he added.

Similarly, like before, they will not extend this guarantee to cases that require investigation in our opinion. Eight working days will be calculated from the date of receipt of all documents requested by the company.

The chief risk officer of a private life insurance company said, "There have been two interpretations of the section about when it will be applicable. While a clarification is yet to come from the regulator's side, if there are some customer grievances that come at this point, it will be settled in the court."

Even in its clarifications to questions asked by insurers, the insurance regulator has not mentioned from which year the provision comes into force.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 05 2015 | 11:03 PM IST

Next Story