In January 2013, Wolfensohn Capital Partners picked up nearly 13 per cent from Carlyle in Repco. The deal valued the Chennai-based housing finance outfit between Rs 700 crore and Rs 800 crore. Carlyle had moved into Repco in early 2008.
The housing finance sector is attracting those PEs funds which are prepared to stay for a long run, according to R V Verma, chairman, National Housing Bank. The strong growth outlook, better quality assets (low defaults), profitability and stable regulatory and supervisory environment are key factors in driving their interest.
H V Harish, partner with Grant Thornton India, said large players such as Housing Development Finance Corp (HDFC) had lent credibility to the sector by building a viable business brick-by-brick. CMP Asia Ltd, a Carlyle group arm, had invested $650 million (Rs 3,530 crore today) in HDFC in May 2007.
While there is competition from banks for hawking loans, the gap between demand and supply (of housing units) is yawning. Funding the salaried class to buy houses is less risky with their assured income and very low delinquency.
Vibha Batra, senior vice-president and co-head financial sector rating at Icra, said it could be a challenge to get access to funds, especially from banks, for nascent housing companies. Typically, housing finance companies (HFCs) require a three-year record before lending institutions could consider extending the facility. It is here that PEs could play the crucial role of chipping in funds, albeit high cost equity capital, during the formative stage, she said. This equity capital by PE funds could be leveraged once lenders develop comfort to lend, after a reasonable track record.
Upcoming HFCs are also looking for PE money. DMI Finance, a Delhi-based non-banking finance company, has just floated a housing finance unit and is looking for capital infusion. In January 2013, the Burman family, promoters of consumer goods major Dabur, picked up a significant stake in DMI.
Shivashish Chatterjee, co-founder of DMI Finance, said besides investing money, PE firms could help to nurture international best practices to keep cost practical. This would help convert higher top line growth into a robust bottom line. According to ratings agency CRISIL, while housing finance outfits have a higher cost of funds compared to banks, they have been able to maintain comparable spreads. With improved efficiencies, lower operating costs and better risk management, HFCs are reporting higher net interest margins. WHY PES ARE BULLISH ON HFCS
- Strong loan demand in dwelling starved market
- Decent and stable return on equity
- Better quality assets (low-loan default record)
- Stable regulatory and supervisory regime
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)