SC frowns on risk firms` approach to accident claims

Image
Press Trust Of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 29 2013 | 1:55 AM IST

The Supreme Court has expressed concern over the increasing tendency of insurance companies to deny compensation to claimants of motor vehicle accidents.

A bench of Justices Altamas Kabir and H S Bedi lamented that insurance companies, being in a dominant position, often act in an “unreasonable” manner after having taken the premium.

“The insurance companies often act in an unreasonable manner and after having accepted the value of a particular insured goods, disown that very figure on one pretext or the other when they are called upon to pay compensation.”

“This ‘take it or leave it’ attitude is clearly unwarranted not only as being bad in law but ethically indefensible,” the bench remarked in its judgement. The bench passed its observations while upholding an appeal filed by Dharmender Goel, owner of a vehicle.

Goel had insured his vehicle for Rs 3,54,000 with the Oriental Insurance Company. When Goel claimed his insurance after meeting with an accident, the company repudiated the claim on the ground that the driver did not possess a valid driving licence.

The insurance company’s surveyor had submitted a report that the vehicle suffered “total loss” and valued the loss at Rs 1.80 lakh.

The district forum dismissed his complaint seeking more compensation, but the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Forum upheld his plea.

It, however, modified the amount of compensation at Rs 1.04 lakh. Dissatisfied with the award, Goel filed an appeal before the National Commission, which enhanced the compensation to Rs 1.80 lakh.

Aggrieved again, he appealed in the apex court. The insurance company reasoned that even if the claim was to be entertained, Goel was entitled to only Rs 1.80 lakh as fixed by the surveyor.

Upholding Goel’s plea, the apex court said the insurance company itself had valued the vehicle at Rs 3.54 lakh and since the vehicle had suffered “total loss”, the insurer cannot take the plea that it would pay only Rs 1.80 lakh as compensation.

The apex court said Section 146 of the Motor Vehicle Act casts an obligation on the owner of a vehicle to take out an insurance policy and any vehicle plying without such policy invites punishment.

“It is therefore, obvious that in the light of this stringent provision and being in a dominant position, the insurance companies often act in an unreasonable manner,” the apex court said. Hence, it directed the insurance company to pay a compensation of Rs 3.44 lakh.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 04 2008 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story