The Finance Ministry is weighing an amendment to capital adequacy rules to try to ensure that the parent companies of systemically important banks are sufficiently well capitalized in the event of a crisis, the government said in a statement on Friday. It cited concern about the impact of possible interest-rate rises on real-estate loans.
“The additional funds the two big banks need to absorb the losses amount to a total of approximately 24 billion francs,” a report accompanying the statement showed. “These must issue new lease-in bonds to the level of their holding for a similar amount.”
The total refinancing costs for the two banks would therefore increase each year by as much as 170 million francs, according to the report. Consultations on the draft proposals will run until July 12.
“We will review the draft and provide a comprehensive comment,” UBS said in an emailed statement on Saturday. “Already today Switzerland has the most stringent capital requirements globally. It’s in the interest of the Swiss financial center to stay competitive internationally. We should have the same rules for all market participants.”
Credit Suisse said in a separate emailed statement that the proposal is “an important clarification” with regards to capital requirements. “The expected Total Loss Absorbing Capacity requirements for Credit Suisse” resulting from the draft proposal “are in-line with our existing guidance,” the bank said.
Swiss authorities want to further tighten capital requirements because they are worried that in the event of another financial crisis large parts of big banks’ capital cushions could be reserved for foreign locations such as the US or the UK and that there may not be enough left for Switzerland, Swiss newspaper Neue Zuercher Zeitung reported on Saturday.
The current proposal “is intended to ensure that sufficient capital is available in the event of a crisis, particularly in parent banks and in the Swiss units that perform systemically important functions,” according to the government statement. Switzerland introduced too-big-to-fail rules after the government came to UBS’s rescue during the 2008 financial crisis. It increased the amount and quality of capital the two lenders have to hold as a buffer against shocks in 2016.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)