Federal agencies have withdrawn 469 proposed regulations compared to a fall 2016 report when Barack Obama was president, according to figures the White House budget office.
This includes 19 regulations with an economic impact of $100 million or more. Another 391 regulations have been delayed for further evaluation and consideration.
Also Read
A report on the regulatory actions was being released on Wednesday.
Federal agencies expect to complete 1,732 regulations this year, roughly a 20 per cent reduction compared to the fall of 2016.
President Donald Trump's push to deregulate has led to concerns among environmentalists, labour unions and consumer watchdogs. The Natural Resources Defence Council has filed lawsuits saying that suspended rules regarding methane leaks violate the Clean Air Act.
Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, issued a report on Wednesday saying the deregulation push has been about rewarding corporate elites such as automakers and Wall Street firms.
The Trump administration said that the Obama administration introduced rules in the last five months of fiscal 2016 that imposed $6.8 billion in annual costs on the economy, while the rules imposed during its first five months have imposed no costs.
Some of the rules involve making government regulations less burdensome. The Interior Department says it plans to reduce the paperwork burden for outdoors-men, fish restoration programs and Native American tribes.
The Labour Department intends to streamline the approval process for new apprenticeship programs. The Federal Railroads Administration is planning a rule to give railroads more flexibility for choosing different types of passenger trains.
During last year's presidential campaign, Trump pledged a drastic and speedy slashing of all federal regulations.
"We're cutting the regulations at a tremendous clip," Trump said in October. "I would say 70 per cent of regulations can go. It's just stopping businesses from growing."
But Rao said that any regulatory reduction through her would take time in order to be effective, saying it has to comply with the law and make sense given cost and benefit analyses. But having only been sworn into office this week, she declined to say whether her office could trim regulations as much as the president has suggested is possible.
"I'm not sure what that percentage would be," she said. "It's really hard to say. We're going to do what we can.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)