While the alleged scams involving Syndicate Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) and Dena Bank took a toll on investor confidence in PSB stocks, Monday’s Supreme Court verdict on coal block allocations have dealt another blow. The court had said coal block allocations between 1993 and 2010 had flouted norms, adding the 12 ultra mega power projects for which coal blocks were allocated through competitive bidding could mine coal from these blocks, but only for power projects these were meant for.
According to a report by Karvy, as of June this year, the banking sector had exposure of Rs 5 lakh crore (8.8 per cent of non-food credit) to the power sector, against 4.3 per cent in March 2008.
“During the same period, the banks financed many new power projects, which might get negatively impacted by the court verdict. Possible cancellation of allotted coal blocks to these projects might adversely impact the chances of recovery of these loans. If these projects fail to take off, banks will have to either write-off or classify these as NPAs (non-performing assets). Even if the court asks the government to re-allocate these blocks, it will mean substantial delays in project and result in slippages and restructuring of loans to these projects,” said Asutosh Kumar Mishra, an analyst with Karvy.
“Therefore, we expect part of this exposure to turn into NPAs through the next 18 months, as many of these projects will become unviable. We maintain our cautious view on the sector, especially on PSBs, which have relatively higher exposure to the sector,” he adds.
Impact assessment
Most PSB stocks fell on Tuesday, with the CNX PSU index slipping 1.3 per cent in intra-day trade, against a 0.3 per cent fall in the CNX Nifty. Top losers OBC, Allahabad Bank, Bank of India, Union Bank of India and Punjab National Bank (PNB) lost two-four per cent.
Rikesh Parikh, vice-president (equities), Motilal Oswal Securities, said, “What happens to the coal block allocations is still a question, as the final hearing on this issue is on September 1. Markets usually pre-empt and react negatively. However, one has to assess the impact after the final verdict and on a case-to-case basis. Let’s wait and see how harsh the verdict is.”
Agrawal said exposure to the power sector, though bigger than the exposure to the iron & steel sector, wouldn’t be impacted much by the court ruling. “I think more than half the banks’ exposure here (power) will be to state electricity boards, state generation companies, etc, which have nothing to do with coal at all,” he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)