With three former Chief Justices of India emphasizing on transparency in the Supreme Court collegiums proceedings for selecting judges, the Congress Party on Sunday laid emphasis on finding a modus vivendi, which is as far as practically possible and acceptable to everyone.
Congress leader Manish Tewari said all stakeholders in the legal process must have a substantive conversation as to what is the best way forward because no system is completely perfect.
"Under those circumstances, if the system precious to the collegiums system was flawed and the collegiums system is imperfect and the judges in their wisdom have found that the National Judicial Appointment's commission was again a flawed paradigm, unconstitutional to say the least and they struck it down," Tewari told ANI.
"But when you are dealing with judicial appointments, you need to find a modus vivendi, which is as far as practically possible (and) acceptable to everyone," he added.
Another Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, however, pointed out that it was just a communication gap and would be resolved soon because the different elements of the collegiums cannot have anything accept the same view regarding transparency and merit and consensual approach.
"I think it is tragic if the collegiums divisions or differences are used or exploited by any external agency.to delay the appointments process that is my fear. It is also my hope and expectation that this will be resolved soon because the different elements of the collegiums cannot possibly have anything accept the same view regarding transparency and merit and consensual approach," said Singhvi.
"So, I have no doubt that they will come together and solve this. But my fear is that any delay in solving this should not be exploited by external agencies to delay the appointments process. Since vacancies, which are already humongous and scary cannot be a casualty for even one moment longer," he added.
Putting forth their concerns, the three ex-CJIs KG Balakrishnan, P Sathasivam and R.M. Lodha backed Justice J. Chelameswar's unprecedented decision to stay away from collegiums meetings because of their "opacity".
Justice Chelameswar earlier strongly criticised the collegium system in vogue for the past 22 years as "absolutely opaque and inaccessible both to public and history, barring occasional leaks."
The fifth senior most judge in the Supreme Court hierarchy, who is scheduled to retire on June 22, 2018, had also observed that the collegium system was without accountability.
Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur has, however, expressed hope that the issue would soon be sorted out.
The collegium system was created by two judgements of the Supreme Court in 1990s in which a body of senior apex court judges headed by the Chief Justice of India selected persons and recommended their names for appointment as judges.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
