Sri Lanka: Previous Parliamentary status enforced until Rajapaksa proves majority

Image
ANI Colombo [Sri Lanka]
Last Updated : Nov 05 2018 | 9:20 PM IST

Speaker of the Sri Lankan Parliament Karu Jayasuriya on Monday said that he was "compelled to accept status that existed previously" in the legislative body until a clear majority was proved by Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.

"Even though I have remained silent so far at a time our motherland is embroiled in an unprecedented crisis. I consider it my paramount duty to act in accordance with my conscience for the protection of rights and privileges of the majority of the Members of Parliament," Jayasuriya said in a statement.

"I wish to emphasise that I am compelled to accept the status that existed previously until such time that they and the new political alliance prove their majority in Parliament," the Speaker added.

Jayasuriya confirmed that as many as 116 Members of Parliament of the United National Party, the Tamil National Alliance, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and the Muslim Congress had approached him saying that President Maithripala Sirisena's decision to sack Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Prime Minister was "unconstitutional and undemocratic".

Meanwhile, taking to his Twitter handle, Wickremesinghe lauded the Speaker's decision, saying: "It is encouraging that the Speaker has issued a strong statement condemning the unconstitutional actions of the President."

"Protests taking place all across the island demonstrate the necessity of resolving this crisis by democratic means, within the framework of the Constitution," the former Prime Minister added.

The JVP also hailed the move with leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake stating that the President had earlier prorogued Parliament in order to lure opposition leaders to the Rajapaksa's side with black money, thus establishing a majority.

However, the Rajapaksa-led Sri Lankan government condemned the statement, requesting the Speaker to rescind it and terming it personal and politically motivated, the Daily Mirror reported.

"Making such a biased statement is unconstitutional and illegal. Decision on certain matters have to be taken according to the Constitution. The Speaker has no right to decide, who should be the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister should be appointed by the President," said Foreign Minister Sarath Amunugama.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 05 2018 | 9:20 PM IST

Next Story