'Budget promises have to match action'

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 01 2017 | 10:42 PM IST

With the BJP-led government seeking to focus on the poor, youth and farmers in the budget presented on Wednesday, political analysts said promises will have to match performance for the party to reap long-term electoral dividends.

They also said that the budget will not have any significant impact in altering equations for the Bharatiya Janata Party in the five states going to the polls in February-March.

Political commentator and senior journalist S. Nihal Singh said the government will continue to build on its narrative of being "pro-poor."

"This is standard legend. Everything they are doing, they say it is for the poor whether it is demonetisation or anything else," Nihal Singh told IANS.

He said that people will judge if pro-poor slogans are "propaganda" or are driven by action on the ground.

Nihal Singh said the budget announcements will not have any significant impact on the elections in five states.

"I do not see much impact," he said, adding that the BJP already has some advantage as demonetisation of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes would have finished any piles of unaccounted cash with its opponents.

Assembly polls will be held in February-March in Punjab, Goa, Manipur, Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh.

The government has said that it has given maximum emphasis to farmers, villagers, poor, dalit and the underprivileged sections of the society in the budget presented by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Wednesday.

A.S. Narang,a former professor of political science at IGNOU, said it was a "safe budget" with "not much risks taken."

He said the government has to implement promises in areas such as job creation to reap electoral dividends in the next Lok Sabha polls.

"The challenge will also be to convey its message of higher financial allocations to sections such as farmers," he said.

Narang added that budget announcements will not have much impact on the outcome of assembly polls.

Subrata Mukherjee, a political analyst who taught at Delhi University, said there should have been more stock-taking in the budget about promises made by the government in the past two-and-a-half years.

He said the unorganised sector faced difficulties during demonetisation, announced in November last year, but there was no major relief for it in the budget.

"The finance minister could have talked of unintended consequences of demonetisation. It would have gone down well with people," Mukherjee said.

--IANS

ps/pgh/bg

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 01 2017 | 10:32 PM IST

Next Story