Fixing floor price for voice, data still at discussion stage: Rajan Mathews

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 16 2017 | 7:43 PM IST

A day after the Indian telecom regulator said the operators have urged it to fix a floor price for both voice and data, Cellular Operators' Association of India Director General Rajan S. Mathews on Friday said the matter was still at a discussion stage.

"The regulators world-over use various models which have various line items which they then look at to determine what is the price at which interconnect happens or which is used as a floor," Mathews told BTVi in an interview.

The COAI is the industry body for all GSM players.

"The TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) has a theoretical model of sorts. It is called Long Run Incremental Cost, that basically says let's look at an optimal network and it is not burdened with legacy stuff or by a particular technology.

"So there is that norm, the model that is used and the elements of cost are then put together and then the cost is determined. So it really takes care and should be agnostic in terms of whether it is 3G/4G or the combination of factors because it is looking at a model, that is a theoretical construct to determine what is the optimal prices," said the COAI Director General.

Talking about interconnection usage charges (IUC), Mathews said India is in a "calling party pays" regulatory regime.

"We are in a 'calling party pays' regulatory regime. Previously, if you noticed both sides paid for a call -- the person making the call, the person receiving the call. The regulator decided to go for where the calling party pays, the receiving party pays zero. This is called the work done principle."

In India, the cost of terminating a call in other network is 14 paise.

"The receiving network does have to terminate that call to its citizen. That has a cost. We cannot say that let all of the revenue remain on the calling party and let there be no cost covered on the called party. So that is the regime, in a 'calling party pays' regime and that is why some cost has to be recovered... that is the role of the regulator to determine what is that optimal cost.

"So, therefore, I think in all regimes worldwide where calling party pays, this is the structured approach. There is an interconnect cost... This cannot be for free," he added.

--IANS

ppg-ag/dg

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 16 2017 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story