In a blow to Tamil Nadu government's efforts to get top court's nod for 'Jallikattu', the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the state's plea seeking recall of its 2014 verdict banning the bull-fights, holding that the practice amounted to cruelty to the animals.
Dismissing the Tamil Nadu government's plea seeking the restoration of Jallikattu during Pongal festival, the bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman brushed aside the state government's argument that the 3,500-year-old tradition was rooted in religion.
Rejecting the argument, the bench, in its orders dismissing the review petition, said that there was no connection or connectivity of Jallikattu with religion.
"Such a concept is alien to the concept of freedom of religion" guaranteed under Article 25 of the constitution, the bench said in its order.
As senior counsel Shekhar Naphade appearing for Tamil Nadu told the court that Jallikattu was a "socio-cultural religious event associated with the harvesting of the crop", the bench said: "It is not a religious practice. It has nothing to do with religion... (By saying that it was religious) we are defaming the framers of the constitution."
Holding that the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act, 2009 was repugnant to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, the top court by its May 7, 2014 verdict had banned the bull-fighting, saying bulls could not be used as performing animals, either for the Jallikattu events or bullock-cart races.
The court by its 2014 verdict had also urged the Union government to accord constitutional status to animal rights.
The court also rejected the Tamil Nadu's position that the state law on Jallikattu was not repugnant to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, as the law covered a "very very narrow space" not occupied by the central law.
Having dismissed the Tamil Nadu government's plea seeking the recall of the May 7, 2014, judgment, the bench said that the hearing on the batch of petitions challenging the January 7, 2016, notification would take place on December 1.
Taking away the very basis of 2014 judgment, January 7 notification permitted the use of bulls for Jallikattu and cart races.
In the last hearing of the matter on November 9, the court had said that though animals may not have rights but they can't be subjected to cruelty by the people and observed that what is embedded in the Constitution and the statute could not be taken away by a notification.
--IANS
pk/vd
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)