The Supreme Court Monday issued notice to the Election Commission on a plea seeking direction for combined counting of votes from a constituency as a whole and not ward-wise.
Issuing the notice, a bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice N.V. Ramana said: "It may not be possible for us as it may require a change in software. We don't have the software."
The court has fixed May 21 as next date of hearing.
Appearing for the PIL petitioner, advocate Yogesh Gupta, lawyer Vaibhav Sehgal said: "The way ward-wise counting was being carried out (these days) revealed to the political parties the number of votes cast in their favour in each of the wards."
"The manner of declaration of result of every polling booth strikes at the root of secrecy attached to the voting," the petition said, adding that, as a consequence, "political parties are able to determine the (number of) votes cast in their favour in every ward".
The fact the political parties become aware of number of votes cast in their favour from every polling booth, "raises fear in the minds of the voters and acts as tool in the hands of the political parties to intimidate the voters", the PIL submitted.
To buttress his contention, Gupta, in his petition referred, to the video where Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar allegedly threatened the villagers of a village in Baramiti constituency that they would suffer in cut in water supply if they did not vote for his cousin and NCP supremo Sharad Pawar's daughter Supriya Sule.
In his purported speech, Ajit Pawar said that he would know the way they have voted from the voting machine.
Pointing to the fallout of the present manner of declaration of results, he said Ajit Pawar's video shows that the remedy lies in the deceleration of the result of the constituency as a whole and not ward-wise.
The PIL said that declaration of result of the constituency as a whole would result in bringing balanced funding and growth of the constituency, thereby reducing the scope of political vendetta.
Gupta said that counting of votes in the constituency as a whole would restore the broad secrecy of the votes as political parties would not be able know the ward wise break up of votes polled in their favour which they are able to make out from the existing system.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
