SC to hear plea against Asthana's appointment as interim CBI chief

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 07 2016 | 6:23 PM IST

The Supreme Court will on Friday hear a PIL by NGO Common Cause challenging appointment of Rakesh Asthana as the Central Bureau of Investigation's interim Director, on grounds it was arbitrary and overlooked established procedure.

A bench of Chief Justice T.S. Thakur, Justice D.Y.Chandrachud and Justice L. Nageswara Rao agreed to hear the PIL after Common Cause lawyer Pranav Sachdeva sought an early hearing.

The petitioner alleged that the government took some steps, including the shifting of former Special Director R.K. Dutta to the Home Ministry, to facilitate bringing Asthana as the interim director.

Seeking the quashing of Asthana's appointment, Common Cause has sought direction to the Central government to initiate the process for appointment of a regular director of the premier investigating agency as per the law.

The society has contended that the government has acted in a "mala fide, arbitrary and illegal manner" to ensure appointment of Asthana as interim director of the CBI.

It further says that just two days before Director Anil Sinha was to step down on December 2, 2016, Dutta was transferred to Union Home Ministry by creating a post of Special Secretary by upgrading by two layers the post of the joint secretary.

This, it said, was done to frustrate the chances of Dutta stepping into the shoes of Sinha as he was number two in the hierarchy of the investigating agency.

The petitionhas pointed out that it was for the first time in one decade that an interim director was thrust on the investigating agency. It said that the process for the appointment of Sinha's successor should have commenced well in advance.

Common Cause, in its PIL, cited the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 and Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, under which the CBI Director is selected by a committee comprising the Prime Minister, leader of the single largest opposition party and Chief Justice of India (or any judge nominated by him).

This shows that the "Government wanted to appoint its own choice as Interim CBI Director, even if it meant bypassing the statutory law, the norms of propriety, and the directions (of the apex court) ... in Vineet Narain's case".

It has also recalled the recent direction of the top court directing the government to appoint a full-time Director of the Enforcement Directorate in a time frame.

--IANS

pk/vd

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 07 2016 | 6:06 PM IST

Next Story