The proposed 15 percent service tax on all spectrum allotment by the Centre and spectrum transactions between licensees will place the telecom industry in a precarious financial position, industry body Assocham said on Thursday.
In a statement issued here, the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham) said it was conveyed to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in a letter on May 10.
"Service tax on spectrum assigned by the government to telecom operators is detrimental to the industry's growth while increasing the cost of service and thus directly impacting the common man," the letter stated.
"In fact, the National Telecom Policy of 2011 lays emphasis on affordability and accessibility," it added.
The letter was written by D.S. Rawat, secretary general, Assocham, and P. Balaji, chairman, Assocham National Council on Telecom.
According to Assocham, the proposed tax will put at risk major government initiatives like 'Digital India', 'Smart Cities' and rural penetration of data connectivity and services.
The industry body urged the minister to restrict the proposed service tax to only transactions involving spectrum trading between private operators, adding that the credit on such transactions should not be deferred.
"The increase in spectrum cost will impact the sector's health and adversely impact the investment corpus of telecom operators, leading to challenges in rolling out new technology and networks like 4G," Assocham added.
"Further, this will materially affect and dent the ability of operators to participate and bid in future auctions, impacting some of them from the survival perspective as well."
Assocham said the country's telecom industry is already burdened with heavy debt, highest taxes and levies, thin operating margins and spectrum prices, that are at least 130 percent of the global norms.
The additional taxes proposed in the 2016 general budget will only force the industry to increase tariffs and thus impact the entire population.
The industry body highlighted that assignment of spectrum is a sovereign function and is not considered as an economic activity globally, and as such is not liable to tax.
"The impact of this regressive tax for developing countries such as India is far more punitive than in developed economies," Assocham said.
--IANS
ppg/ag/tsb/dg
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
