What really caused the train disaster in UP?

Image
IANS Lucknow
Last Updated : Mar 24 2015 | 12:22 PM IST

Over three days after a train disaster left 38 people dead in Uttar Pradesh, it is not still clear what really caused the horrific accident.

Preliminary inquiry into the March 20 derailment in Rae Bareli district has apparently thrown up various versions, railway sources say.

Thirty-eight people were killed and dozens injured when the engine and three coaches of the Varanasi-bound Janata Express went off the tracks at Bachranwa, a small railway station.

The train had originated at Dehradun, Uttarakhand.

Speaking on the condition of anonymity, some officials said the preliminary investigation also exposed poor maintenance of the coaches that derailed.

A Northern Railway official said the incident "exposed the entire system".

"Even the maintenance of the coaches had been given a go-by for years," he alleged. The coaches were reportedly 25 years old.

A maintenance check on one of the derailed coaches was scheduled for January 2 this year but it was not done, the official said.

This particular coach took the maximum impact, and was reduced from a 69-feet length train car to 10 feet of mangled remains of steel and iron.

Also, all the four brakes in the engine as well as the guard vacuum brake did not function that day, resulting in disaster, added the same source.

The train driver, the assistant driver and the guard, who were injured in the accident, were discharged from a railway medical facility on Sunday.

While the guard, A.K. Gupta, denies driver Parasnath Mishra's claim that he informed him of the brake failure on walkie-talkie, officials at Bachrawan station say none of the two said anything on the subject before the accident.

Soon after the accident, railway officials said that prima facie the train driver was to blame for the disaster.

He was accused of not stopping the train at Bachrawan, and then suddenly diverting the train on to a parallel track.

But some officials say it is good he did that because another train was approaching this train on the same track from the opposite direction.

Had the driver not diverted the train, there could have been a head-on collision, these officials say.

But if that is true, then who was at fault? The driver of the train that derailed or the train coming from the opposite direction?

As of now, there are too many questions and too few clear answers.

(Mohit Dubey can be to contacted at mohit.d@ians.in <mailto:mohit.d@ians.in>)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 24 2015 | 12:10 PM IST

Next Story