Controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, wanted by Indian investigating agencies for inciting youth to take up terror activities, on Wednesday said he will not come back unless assured fair prosecution.
"The news of my coming to India is totally baseless and false. I have no plans to come to India till I don't feel safe from unfair prosecution. Insha Allah when I feel that the government will be just and fair, I will surely return to my homeland," the founder of NGO Islamic Research Foundation said in a statement.
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) said it has no information about the return of the televangelist to India on Wednesday.
"We have no information about this. We are verifying the news reports," an NIA spokesperson said.
Naik is accused of spreading hatred by his provocative speeches, promoting enmity between communities, funding terrorists and laundering several crores of rupees over the years.
Rumour about Naik's return to India spread after a section of Indian news channels, quoting sources in the Malaysian government, aired news that the 51-year-old fugitive could be deported as early as Wednesday night.
Naik, who fled India on July 1, 2016, after terrorists in neighbouring Bangladesh said they were inspired by his speeches. He is currently living in Malaysia.
In November 2016, the NIA registered a case against the televangelist at its Mumbai branch under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. His Mumbai-based NGO Islamic Research Foundation has already been declared an unlawful association by the Union Home Ministry.
The preacher came under the lens of security agencies after some terrorists, allegedly involved in the attack on a cafe in Dhaka in July 2016, reportedly claimed they were inspired by his speeches.
In December last year, Interpol turned down NIA's request for a Red Corner notice (RCN) against Naik, saying no chargesheet was filed against him at the time of submission of the request.
The NIA, which had made the RCN request through the Central Bureau of Investigation in May 2017, however was quick to clarify that the ground was merely a "technical" one as the chargesheet was filed subsequently on October 26, 2017, "a fact that Interpol did not take cognisance of".
--IANS
rak/him/vm
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
