Europe: The eurozone economy is stabilising. While the first estimate of the region’s GDP in the second quarter showed a tiny 0.1 per cent decline, there were increases of 0.3 per cent in both Germany and France. But cheers should be muted.
Sure, positive surprises are welcome after many months of deterioration. The consensus expectation of eurozone GDP change for 2009 moved from 0.5 per cent growth last October to a 4.2 per cent decline in June, before improving to a 4 per cent decline in July, according to research boutique Consensus Forecasts. Expectations are likely to become less negative once again.
If this recession were to follow the recent historical pattern, the forecasts would soon be moving up dramatically. In the four downturns since 1974, eurozone GDP declined an average of 1.1 per cent, followed by an average 4.7 per cent cumulative growth in the two years following the trough, according to BNP Paribas. The shrinkage this time has been 5 per cent, suggesting near double-digit percentage growth rates during the recovery.
Some economists are already talking about such a v-shaped recovery in the eurozone and around the world. But this time could well be different — and more difficult.
To start, the recession has hit so much of the world that few countries can rely on sustained export growth to pull them out of trouble. That is especially true of eurozone members, since their currency is expensive and demand for capital goods — the region’s strong point — won’t return in strength until a global recovery is well established.
The main challenge to growth, though, is financial. A still crippled global credit system will keep consumers and businesses cautious. The end of preternaturally low policy interest rates and frighteningly high government deficits isn’t yet in sight, but the transition to normality could easily go wrong.
The relevant precedents are both discouraging. Japan, which resembles the eurozone in its savings culture and ageing population, has never fully recovered from the excesses of the 1980s. And the US central bank’s attempt to keep a non-inflationary recovery on track with a tightening in 1936 caused a recessionary relapse.
Enjoy the good news while it lasts. There are reasons to suppose it may not last that long.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
