Flies in the ointment

GSK case no cure for Chinese corruption

Image
John Foley
Last Updated : May 15 2014 | 10:25 PM IST
The charges of bribery levelled by Chinese authorities against three executives of drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline may make it appear Beijing is as tough on corruption as it ought to be. Behind the façade is a broken healthcare system and a government many foreign groups don't know how to handle.

GSK was accused of paying bribes back in 2013 to get its drugs into Chinese hospitals. It has already apologised for misdeeds, though says its UK-based head office was unaware of the goings-on. Now, a state investigation has alleged that the then-head of its China unit, as well as its Chinese-born head of human resources and legal counsel, encouraged staff to pay kickbacks amounting to "billions" of yuan. The case is in the hands of prosecutors.

Authorities gain if they find graft went to the top of GSK's China operation. President Xi Jinping has talked of catching "tigers" as well as "flies." But the breeding grounds go unaddressed. China's medical system is underfunded and overloaded. Patients bribe doctors for treatment, and practitioners are sometimes happy to accept payments for selling certain drugs. So, endemic is the graft that online retailer Alibaba launched a service last May designed to clean up abuses in the way medical appointments are arranged.

Fixing China's health system, and addressing the demand side of the bribery equation, is a slow task. Spending on healthcare is just over five per cent of GDP compared with more than nine per cent in the UK, according to the World Health Organisation. New rules introduced late last year prohibit linking doctors' pay to drug sales and could see companies who bribe placed on blacklists, even if prosecutors don't bring a case. But while foreign-company executives may seem disposable, China can't afford to scare away would-be clinicians as its population ages and sickens.

Meanwhile, GSK seems to have fallen foul of a Byzantine system. The company focused its response to the investigation on the security ministry that led the assault, according to a person familiar with the situation. But many other agencies have a say in regulating China's markets. Fragmented institutions make it hard for foreign companies to know when to apologise for what, and to whom. They also make it easier for would-be rule breakers to find loopholes. GSK's misfortune brings lessons, but a cure for China's graft fever remains distant.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 15 2014 | 9:32 PM IST

Next Story