Mother lodes

Image
Robert Cyran
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 8:45 PM IST

Facebook: Facebook’s success may seem sui generis. But the social network’s disputed paternity and burgeoning value — as much as $85 billion at last check — is creating a familiar commotion. People are coming out of the woodwork to claim a share of Mark Zuckerberg’s creation. In that respect, the story bears striking parallels with past bonanzas, especially Nevada's wild silver rush 150 years ago.

The Comstock Lode was the Silicon Valley of its day. The market value of companies excavating its wealth was around $40 million by 1865, about half the value of all the real estate and personal property in San Francisco at the time. That would equate to about $60 billion in today's economy. The ecosystem that sprung up around the mines included engineers developing new technologies to extract silver from stone. Hundreds of companies were formed. A few captured nearly all the spoils. Just as today, the combination of uncertain ownership and tremendous wealth invited controversy. Miner Gould & Curry, for example, attracted 15 lawsuits in one year. Such legal claims consumed an estimated 20 per cent of the revenue generated by the Comstock Lode in the first several years of operation.

The outcomes resemble Facebook's travails. Early and important figures - Eduardo Saverin at Facebook or James Finney at Comstock - were celebrated as genial figures, but pushed out for a fraction of the eventual riches. And like the Winklevoss twins suing Facebook today, others who claimed to own Comstock Lode land but who didn't do any heavy lifting were given a chunk of cash and told to go away.

Outsiders can’t tell whether today’s claimants are victims or opportunists. The latest is Paul Ceglia, a wood-pellet salesman and accused larcenist, who says he bought half of Facebook in 2003. Some mine owners took money from investors before telling them a rich shaft was worthless. Other plaintiffs submitted fabricated evidence against wealthy miners.

The parallels do have their limits. Zuckerberg isn't like Henry “Pancake” Comstock, for whom the lode was named. Comstock finagled his way in using $50 and a blind horse. Zuckerberg actually built Facebook. That’s significant. An untapped mine with rich silver deposits is worth a fortune. An undeveloped social network is just a good idea.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 19 2011 | 12:53 AM IST

Next Story