It is worrying, therefore, that the new government does not seem to be acting quickly on the existing action plans produced by independent bodies in the past. Mr Jaitley was specifically asked his opinion on the implementation of the recommendations of a committee led by P J Nayak that investigated public sector banks. The committee's report suggested that public sector banks be professionalised - in particular by reducing government control and shifting much of its shareholding to an independent holding company. This is a sensible first step. However, on being asked about the Nayak report, Mr Jaitley said: "You will have to wait for our application of mind on these subjects." While the Nayak Committee's recommendations should be reviewed, this process cannot take a long time to complete. The road map exists; the new government should start implementing it after a quick review. It should not pretend that it has so fundamentally different an approach that it needs to reinvent the wheel.
Another such example is that of the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission, or FSLRC. The commission's report even separates necessary reforms into short-, medium- and long-term actions. Many of the short-term actions are administrative changes. There should be no hesitation in implementing these changes. Already the very sensible and necessary proposal for a unified financial regulator is being stalled by vested interests in various regulatory bodies. They should not be allowed to prevail - in an increasingly complex financial sector, regulatory clarity is essential. The Sahara group's fall reveals the perils of persisting with a system that allows regulatory shopping.
Mr Jaitley has made all the right noises about fiscal stability and macroeconomic prudence. However, the only solid answer to short-term concerns is to show that long-term reform is in place. This is where the previous government failed. The new one should not repeat its errors. One such grave error would be to sit back and think when action is required. Reports like those from the Nayak Committee and the FSLRC are hardly tainted by association with the previous government. Rather than reconsideration, they need implementation. After all, is that not what this government was elected to do?
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
