As rosy as the macroeconomic picture might be, there are a number of contradictory factors that the RBI needs to consider while making its decision. One, as benign as the oil price situation has been in the face of persistent conflict in West Asia, this is not something that can be taken for granted. A sharp rise in prices can quickly destabilise the macroeconomy on multiple fronts, including inflation. And while the monsoon has shown distinct signs of revival, it is too early to predict the consequences of the first-half deficiency on production and prices. The behaviour of vegetable prices during July certainly suggests potential problems. A flare-up in food inflation after a repo rate cut would well lead to a pause in the next announcement, diluting the impact of a cut done next week. And, importantly, the RBI's most recent household survey of inflation expectations shows that expectations, while showing signs of declining, are still well above 10 per cent. A rate cut in this situation risks sending the signal that the RBI is comfortable with these levels, which is somewhat contradictory to its stated objective of bringing them down.
The pros and cons, therefore, are finely balanced. Which way should the scales tilt? This newspaper is of the view that maintaining the status quo is the RBI's best option in the upcoming announcement. This is based on three considerations. First, while inflation has indeed softened over the past month, the upside risks currently outweigh the prospects of moderation. Food prices have been the bane of monetary policy for long; there needs to be a sustained moderation to create adequate space for an easing phase in interest rates. Second, the government has made several commitments to easing supply-side constraints and fiscal consolidation, but there's many a slip between the cup and the lip. Delivery on these commitments will again create a larger space for stimulus. Third, there is the critical issue of credibility. The RBI is clearly determined to strengthen and entrench its inflation-fighting credentials, most recently reflected in its proposed shift to an inflation-targeting regime. It would risk credibility if a cut in August was proved to be premature by events. The potential stimulus provided by a 25-basis-point cut is not worth the risk.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
