It has been two years since the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, has come into force. However, the awareness and compliance level of corporate India - beyond the large Indian corporate groups and MNCs in India - on prevention of the sexual harassment law has been low. "Compliance with this law still does not feature high on the list of priorities of smaller organisations. Such organisations still have a reactive approach to the subject, and are not doing enough to raise awareness amongst employees on this issue," said Atul Gupta, partner, Trilegal.
Corporate India's complacency to comply with the law, in letter and spirit, was reflected in the findings of a survey conducted around middle of last year by EY India. Nearly 31 per cent of the respondents were found not compliant with the Act, even after its enactment. Further, 35 per cent of the respondents said they were unaware of the penal clause of the law. The survey found that 44 per cent of the respondents' organisations did not display prominently the penal consequences, as mandated by the law.
Perhaps, the most disturbing anecdotal evidence about corporate India's nonchalant attitude was that 40 per cent of the respondents were yet to train their Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) members in the legal and procedural intricacies of conducting an enquiry. This assumes added significance as the Act vests the powers of a civil court to the ICC and its procedure. Legal experts point out that every piece of evidence discovered or collected during the investigation needs to be preserved and is open to scrutiny by the ICC, law enforcement agencies or the court of law. "We have seen ICC proceedings being challenged directly through writ petitions. The onus on ensuring that the ICC's proceedings are procedurally sound is significant," said Gupta.
| THE LEGAL DOS AND DON’TS FOR A COMPANY |
All organisations must...
|
HR experts say the effectiveness of any anti-sexual harassment programme in an organisation depends on seriousness of the company to have workplace equality, and the awareness levels among employees. Clearly, the ball is in the court of the employer to ensure that women employees feel safe to report any complaints without the fear of victimisation.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)