Congress countering TRAI Bill for sake of it: Naidu

The TRAI (Amendment Bill) aims to remove legal hurdles in the appointment of former TRAI chief Nripendra Misra as principal secretary to PM

The government and the Congress sparred over the TRAI (Amendment) Bill which was passed by Lok Sabha today, with Union minister M Venkaiah Naidu saying that Congress was countering it only for the sake of opposition and former minister Shashi Tharoor maintaining there were issues of principle involved.

"The Congress party is opposing for the sake of opposing," Naidu said, adding that the Prime Minister has the right to appoint his Principal Secretary.

"As said by the Minister for Telecommunications, this is aimed at bringing parity with regard to different regulatory authorities. There is nothing unusual about it. There was a sort of a mistake or shortcoming earlier that has been rectified," he told reporters outside the Parliament.

The TRAI (Amendment Bill) aims to remove legal hurdles in the appointment of former TRAI chief Nripendra Misra as principal secretary to the Prime Minister.

Speaking to reporters, Naidu said the Prime Minister was chosen by an overwhelming majority of the people of India and has got every right to choose an officer of his choice.

"And that officer has got impeccable character. Nobody has questioned his integrity, honesty and commitment and calibre also. So naturally, the house has approved it," he said.

He justified taking the ordinance route to appoint Misra as the Principal Secretary saying the Prime Minister is not an individual but an institution and there was need to have his officer from day one.

Naidu further said that he was surprised at Congress' objections over the ordinance claiming that "it is the Congress which has used, misused the ordinance route, umpteen number of times".

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said his party was raising issues of principle.

"This is not about him (Misra), it is not about the Prime Minister. What it is about is two issues of principle. The first is can you actually change a law to suit one person. What are you signaling about our democracy? What are you saying that ultimately if a law stands in the way of an individual, in this case, the Prime Minister, the individual's wishes will take precedence over the considered law of the land," he said.