2 G.Os on formation of land grab cells, related courts quashed

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 10 2015 | 9:55 PM IST
The Madras High Court today quashed two government orders of July 28 2011 and August 11 2011 for formation of 36 anti Land Grabbing Special Cells to deal with them and constituting special courts in some districts to conduct trial of such cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The First bench, comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sathyanarayanan, did so after hearing petitions challenging their validity but gave the government liberty to bring in any appropriate legislation on the lines of A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 or a better one.
"Though it is to be stated that government has power to appoint Special Judge to try a particular case or group of cases, in the case on hand investigating and trying the cases related to land grab which falls under sections 447, 420 and 506(ii) of IPC and other offenses, regular courts are conferred with jurisdiction to try those cases and no purpose will be served by keeping such special courts in existence."
The petitioners contended that the former Chief Minister, who is also General Secretary of ruling AIADMK, has taken steps to 'punish' all former DMK Ministers and their representatives under the guise of land and property/immovable property bought by them or negotiated, through police force by constituting special cells in all districts under her direct supervision.
Even the AIADMK poll manifesto had made an announcement that action would be taken in this regard as soon as the party comes to power, they said.
The petitoners submitted that even the budget speech on August 4, 2011 stated that police were prompt to act in respect of forcible land-grabbing which occured during the previous DMK rule and special cells were formed at district levels.
They contended that based on false complaints obtained by police from 'so-called affected parties', vendors and even without any preliminary enquiry to find the genuineness or authenticity of the complaints, indiscriminate arrests were made even at midnight "as if the purchasers are terrorists."
In some cases,the Goondas Act has been invoked, they said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 10 2015 | 9:55 PM IST

Next Story