Separate Law Ministry statements said today that 13 additional judges from Calcutta High Court, six from Kerala High Court and five from Bombay High Court have been given extension for six months.
Usually additional judges are appointed for a period of two years and later elevated as permanent judges.
Seeking to overcome the shortage of judges in high courts, government had sought approval from the Supreme Court to extend the terms of judges from three to six months when the validity of the National Judicial Appointments Act was being heard in the apex court. The law was struck down on October 16 last.
While deciding on ways to improve the collegium system, the Supreme Court had recently left it to the law ministry to draft the MoP in consultation with CMs and chief justices of the 24 high courts.
The five additional judges from Bombay High Court given extension or granted 'reappointment' are: Vinay Manohar Deshpande, Ajey Shrikant Gadkari, Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, Girish Sharadchandra Kulkarni and Burgess Pesi Colabawalla.
The 13 Calcutta High Court judges granted extension are: Indrajit Chatterjee, Shib Sadhan Sadhu, Sudip Ahluwalia, Tapash Mookherjee, Ranjit Kumar Bag, Ishan Chandra Das, Samapati Chatterjee, Sahidullah Munshi, Subrata Talukdar, Tapabrata Chakraborty, Arindam Sinha, Arijit Banerjee and Debangsu Basak.
Six additional judges of the Kerala High Court given extension are: Puttekadan Ubaid, Kandathil Abraham Mathew, Alexander Thomas, Muhamed Mustaque Ayumantakath, Ala Kunnil Jayasankaran Nambiar and Anil Kalavampara Narendran.
These appointments assume importance as the Supreme Court
is functioning with only 25 judges though its approved strength is 31, including the CJI.
While Justice Thakur will retire on January 3, 2017, five more apex court judges will retire this year. These include Justice A R Dave who will retire on November 18, Justice F M I Kalifulla (July 22), Justice V Gopala Gowda (October 5), Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (November 12) and Justice C Nagappan (October 3).
In 2014, U U Lalit and R F Nariman were appointed as SC judges, but the government had returned the file of former Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium citing negative Intelligence Bureau report.
After a bitter spat with the government, Subramanium had withdrawn his name.
The recommendations come at a time when the Supreme Court collegium is yet to give its view on the draft of the revised memorandum of procedure to the government. So far, the collegium has refrained from recommending names for the apex court.
The memorandum, a document which guides the appointment of SC and HC judges, was revised after a Supreme Court bench asked the government to rewrite it in a bid to make collegium system more transparent.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
