AAP govt slapped with fine for not responding to HC notice

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 20 2017 | 6:42 PM IST
The AAP government has been slapped with a fine of Rs 5,000 by the Delhi High Court for failing to respond to a notice issued by the court on a radio cab operator's plea alleging levy of excess road tax.
The cab operator, Magic Sewa, has claimed in its plea that road tax being demanded from it was in excess of what was permitted under the law and more than what was being collected from regular taxis.
While imposing the costs, Justice A K Chawla directed the Delhi government's transport department to file its affidavit within two weeks on the plea.
The petitioners, which also include owner-drivers of several city cabs, have contended they were being asked to obtain licences in the individual category by misinterpreting the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court has now fixed the matter for further hearing on January 4 next year.
Magic Sewa, in its petition, has also alleged that the government was also asking city taxi aggregators to submit bank guarantees of Rs 15 lakh which were in excess of what was permitted under the law.
"The respondent is collecting road tax from the petitioners' city taxis at a rate of Rs 1,980 whereas the rate of road tax specified under Delhi Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1962 is only Rs 605. The respondent also requires city taxis to obtain a licence whereas there is no such provision under the law.
"Further, petitioner no.1 was made to furnish a bank guarantee in the sum of Rs 15,00,000 whereas the amount specified under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is only Rs 5,000," the petition, filed in May 2016, said and added that the representations to the government have gone unanswered.
The taxi operator has sought directions prohibiting the government from collecting road tax in excess of what is specified under Delhi Motor Vehicles Taxation Act.
The plea has sought a refund or adjustment of excess road tax collected from the petitioners for the registration of their taxis" and directions "prohibiting the respondent from requiring the petitioners to obtain a licence under the City Taxi Scheme, 2015".
Taking note of it, the court in its interim order had made clear that the road tax to be paid by the petitioners shall be subject to the final outcome of the writ petition.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 20 2017 | 6:42 PM IST

Next Story