In a letter to Home Minister Rajnath Singh, Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia said the city's Home Minister was "superior" to the special secretaries working under him and therefore has "lawful power" to place them under suspension.
"Implementing MHA's order will seriously undermine the authority of an elected government and promote widespread indiscipline and insubordination among the DANICS officers, which may result into complete paralysis of Delhi government," the letter said.
The two officers - Subhash Chandra and Yashpal Garg from Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Civil Services (DANICS) -- were suspended after they reportedly refused to sign Delhi government's cabinet notes pertaining to a salary hike for public prosecutors and prison staff, leading to an unprecedented mass leave by over 250 senior government officials.
The Ministry of Home Affairs had on Friday last declared the decision null and void and said the two officers will be deemed on duty.
In the letter, the Delhi government cited an old MHA
directive under which a government servant may be placed under suspension and quoted sections of the Transaction of Business Rules (Rule 14(2)).
"The MHA acted surprisingly fast. While issuance of deemed suspension in case of red handed arrest of SP Singh took about 15 days for MHA, it took merely one day to declare the suspension of two special secys void," Sisodia said.
Reacting strongly to the bureaucrats going on mass leave on December 31, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had said the government was exploring "all options" against those who participated in the strike.
He had also said time has come to replace bureaucrats with professionals and sector experts to infuse fresh energy and ideas in governance.
Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Civil Service (DANICS) officers are selected through civil service exams conducted by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) and the Union Home Ministry is their cadre-controlling authority.
Seeking to describe the circumstances that apparently led to the suspension order, the government said the Delhi High Court, in its order dated September 3, 2015, had directed it to issue orders in this regard.
"...To issue appropriate orders expeditiously for implementation of revised remuneration fee and retainership fee for all public prosecutors referring cabinet note which had already been approved.
Later, on December 23, the government Cabinet reiterated its decision to hike the fees and sent a copy of its decision to the LG, the letter said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
