The case under various IPC sections, including criminal breach of trust by a public servant, cheating, criminal conspiracy and under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, was registered against Hooda, the then Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) chairman, an ex-officio post held by him as the CM, and four other top officials of HUDA then, by the vigilance bureau on May 5.
The plot had been initially allotted to AJL in 1982. After the expiry of the lease period in 1996, then Haryana Vikas Party goverment led by Bansi Lal took back its possession. It was reallotted to AJL after the Congress leader came to power in 2005.
The official said that an officer of SP rank would probe the case under the supervision of an officer of IG rank or above.
The bureau has alleged that the act by the then HUDA chairman and the officials had caused a huge financial loss to HUDA as the plot should have been sold through open auction instead of being alloted again to AJL.
On the new FIR, Hooda told reporters that no rules had been violated in the allotment.
"This government has unleashed political vendetta," Hooda
said.
Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar countered Hooda, saying there was no question of any political vendetta.
"The present government had zero tolerance towards corruption and wherever any wrongdoing comes to light, it would be probed as per law," Khattar told reporters.
In a missive to the Chief Minister, Leader of the Opposition Abhay Chautala had said a plot measuring 3,360 square metres in the prime location of Sector 6 in Panchkula was reallotted to the Associated Journals Ltd on June 29, 2005.
"This plot had been allotted to the Associated Journals Ltd. (AJL) in 1982, but after the company failed to make use of the land, it (the lease of the land) was resumed in the year 1996," he had said.
"It is evident from media reports that the then Chief Minister was advised by the administration as well as by the LR (Legal Remembrance) that there was no legal provision for such reallotment and if, however, the provisions or policy allow, then it can only be allotted afresh at the prevalent rates," he said.
Chautala had also stated that keeping in view the facts, a prima facie cognisable criminal offence has been made out against the persons, including Hooda.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
