Anger as Afghan MPs halt women's bill debate

Image
AFP Kabul
Last Updated : May 18 2013 | 7:55 PM IST
The Afghan parliament today cut short a debate on a bill to protect women from violence after complaints from some traditionalist MPs that it was against Islamic teaching.
The Elimination of Violence against Women (EVAW) law, which was passed by a presidential decree in 2009, is seen as a benchmark piece of legislation marking progress since the fall of the Taliban regime nearly 12 years ago.
But ratification by parliament was postponed after several MPs branded the bill as against Sharia law -- the Islamic teachings drawn from the Koran, the Prophet Mohammad and rulings by scholars.
"This law is just a government project, it is against Sharia... We need to discuss more about this and remove articles that are against Islam," Abdul Sattar Khawasi, a conservative MP from Parwan province, said.
In a rowdy debate, some male lawmakers shouted out that child marriage -- made illegal by the bill -- should not be a crime.
But there were also strong supporters of the law during today's curtailed session in parliament.
"This bill was signed into effect after enormous efforts by women, this law is to defend the rights of poor women in towns and villages," Takhar province MP Mariam Kofi said.
"We are hopeful of getting it passed finally. If it is not passed, it would be a disaster to all Afghan women.... For us it is signed by president and it is a law already." she said.
Aimal Faizi, President Hamid Karzai's spokesman, told reporters that Karzai would not interfere in parliamentary affairs but suggested that the palace was working to boost support for the bill.
"It is up to them to pass it or not to pass it, but the president has recently met with representatives of women and civil society,' Faizi said.
"They have discussed these concerns that the women have in regard to this bill and what kind of support we can get from within the parliament."
The Elimination of Violence against Women (EVAW) bill is already officially law, but many women's rights activists fear that conservative MPs could water it down by insisting on amendments, or even try to throw it out completely.
"We did not want this law to go to parliament. But unfortunately it happened," Mahbooba Seraj, an activist, told AFP.
"Afghan women have fought for years to make this law. If parliament changes it, women will go ten years backwards and they will have to restart their fight."
The law bans violence against women, child marriages and forced marriages, and is considered one of the government's key achievements since the fall of the Taliban, which banned women from attending school or any form of public activity.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 18 2013 | 7:55 PM IST

Next Story