Assam dragging its feet on illegal Bangladeshi migrants: SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 31 2015 | 5:57 PM IST
The Supreme Court today slammed the Assam Government for "dragging its feet" and rejected its "vague" and "highly unsatisfactory" affidavit on the steps taken regarding the influx of illegal Bangladesh nationals through the porous Indo-Bangla border in the state.
The apex court expressed "displeasure over the conduct of the state government" and questioned its "seriousness" in taking steps to comply with its December 17 directions.
"The affidavit of Assam Government is highly unsatisfactory. It is not only vague but the officer has no exposure to ground reality. We refuse to accept the affidavit. We are expressing displeasure over the conduct of the state government," a bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and R F Nariman said.
The bench directed the Chief Secretary to file a "meaningful affidavit" within a week on the steps taken in pursuant to its December 17, 2014 order.
The bench said the failure to file a proper affidavit would lead to calling of the state's chief secretary for explanation.
It also directed the Assam Government to apprise it about the steps taken to comply with its direction to meet the deadline of January 2016 for updating of the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
At the outset, the bench expressed its anguish over the affidavit filed by a junior official and asked "does he know anything what is going on?"
"See the seriousness with which this matter is treated," it said adding that "shall we call this man and ask what is there in the affidavit? Does he know what is there?"
The bench was also at pain to say that despite assurances 500 police units and task force to detect illegal migrants have not been activated within a month.
"Affidavit says that steps taken for constitution of 500 units of task force, but they are not yet in place," the bench observed, noting that three months have passed since the judgement was delivered with a slew of directions both for the state and the Centre.
"The fact has been that you have dragged your feet. We will say your affidavit is highly unsatisfactory worth not accepting. We will call your chief secretary. This is not the way. You have dragged your feet for years and years and still dragging," the bench observed during the hearing.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 31 2015 | 5:57 PM IST

Next Story