Bhutto's children, party disappointed by verdict on her murder

Image
Press Trust of India Islamabad
Last Updated : Aug 31 2017 | 9:07 PM IST
The children of Pakistan's assassinated prime minister Benazir Bhutto today voiced their disappointment over the verdict by an anti-terrorism court, saying there would be no justice until "Pervez Musharraf answers for his crimes".
The anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi sentenced two former police officers to 17 years in prison for failing to protect Bhutto, but the same court acquitted five suspected Pakistani Taliban militants who had confessed to taking part in her 2007 assassination.
Benazir, 54, was killed in a gun-and-bomb attack outside Rawalpindi's Liaquat Bagh on December 27, 2007 when Musharraf was president of Pakistan.
The court also declared former dictator and army chief Gen Pervez Musharraf an absconder in the case and ordered seizure of his property.
A joint investigation team had implicated Musharraf in the case, saying that his government did not provide adequate security to the former prime minister despite her repeated requests.
Musharraf, 74, has been living in Dubai since last year when he was allowed to leave Pakistan on pretext of medical treatment.
Pakistan Peoples Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the "decision is disappointing and unacceptable", adding that the party would explore legal options.
Aseefa Bhutto-Zardari, the youngest of the siblings, said that "they were still awaiting justice".
In another tweet, she said that there would be no justice until "Pervez Musharraf answers for his crimes".
Sharing her sister's sentiments, Bakhtawar Bhutto-Zardari also expressed displeasure with the verdict, saying "police men arrested but actual terrorists acquitted #Shame".
Farhatullah Babar, the spokesman for PPP, expressed "disappointment and shock"over the verdict, saying "justice has not been done."
Babar said the acquittal of the suspected militants "seems a triumph of al-Qaida." He said that while the court convicted the two officers, it did not determine who had ordered them to destroy evidence.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 31 2017 | 9:07 PM IST

Next Story