BJP leader asked to approach appropriate court on complaint

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 08 2016 | 8:29 PM IST
A Delhi court today asked BJP leader Praveen Jain to approach the appropriate court for action on his complaint against AAP MLA Som Dutt for allegedly concealing facts in his affidavit filed before the Election Commission ahead of Delhi Assembly polls.
Metropolitan Magistrate Snigdha Sarvaria directed Jain to approach the court concerned, saying the case was out of her jurisdiction.
Earlier on August 14, the court had taken cognisance of Jain's complaint and recorded the pre-summoning evidence in the case.
Jain had contested the Assembly election 2015 from Sadar Bazar constituency here against Dutt.
The complaint alleged that Dutt had filed false affidavit before Election Commission during the 2013 and 2015 Assembly elections in which he declared that his parents were not dependent on him.
It claimed that as per the RTI reply obtained by advocate Vivek Garg, who is the counsel for the complainant, Dutt has obtained a medical facility card under the Delhi Government Employees Health Scheme from government of NCT of Delhi and in the card, he has disclosed that his parents are dependent on him.
The complaint said only the dependent parents can avail the medical facility on the card of an MLA.
"That from the above, it is clear that at one side, accused Som Dutt declared his parents as independent in both of his affidavits, filed/sworn before the Returning Officer AC-19 of Election Commission of India during the 2015 and 2013 elections by not declaring their (parents) assets/liabilities and on another side, he disclosed his parents as dependent on him in his medical facility card," it alleged.
The complaint has been filed for alleged offences under various sections of the IPC, including 200 (using as true such declaration knowing it to be false), 199 (false statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence) and 193 (giving or fabricating false evidence) and under provisions of the Representation of People (RP) Act.
The complaint further alleged that Dutt had prepared false affidavits to mislead the voters.
It alleged that Dutt has claimed a medical allowance of Rs 4,631 and managed to reimburse allowance of Rs 3,421.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 08 2016 | 8:29 PM IST

Next Story