Burning of effigy is not disqualification for enrolment: HC

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 17 2015 | 10:22 PM IST
The Madras High Court today ordered enrolment of an eligible person as an advocate saying his enrolment could not be denied merely because he had a criminal case of burning effigy of a political leader pending against him.
Pointing out that there is no provision in IPC which makes burning of effigies a punishable offence, Justice V Ramasubramanian said the Constitution protected the act of burning effigies, if no other mischief was associated with it.
In the absence of a specific offence in IPC covering effigy-burning, police invariably charge persons who burn effigies only for an offence punishable under Section 285 which prohibits rash and negligent handling of fire or combustible matter as it would endanger public safety and human lives, Justice Ramasubramanian said.
The ruling came on a petition by A Santhos Yadav whose application for enrolment as an advocate was put on hold by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry in November 2014, as his name figured in a criminal case registered by Thirukoilur police in Villupuram district.
For over a year, it has been the practise of the Bar Council to verify the criminal antecedents, if any, of law graduates who apply for enrolment as advocates.
The practise came into being following an order of Justice N Kirubakaran as a precautionary measure to prevent entry of criminals in the legal profession.
Justice Ramasubramanian said Santhos Yadav was a district secretary of a political party and on October 4, 2014 he had organised an agitation against a political party leader at Thirukoilur. The political party leader's effigy was burnt on the occasion and a case was registered against him.
"The short question is whether the participation of a person in an agitation to advance a political cause and the burning of an effigy as part of the agitation could be taken to be something that will make the offender a person with criminal background so as to dis-entitle him from getting enrolled as an advocate", the Judge said.
"Persons charged with the allegation of burning effigies of political leaders to advance either the cause of a political party or a political philosophy cannot be said to belong to the category of persons whose entry into the profession should be barred. Santhos Yadav cannot be stated to be a person with criminal background.", the judge said.
He then directed the Bar Council to enroll Santhos Yadav as an advocate.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 17 2015 | 10:22 PM IST

Next Story