"Can such a person be permitted to be a part of the society?" asked Justices V M Kanade and P D Kode, while hearing an appeal filed by Mane against the death sentence awarded to him by a Pune court.
The judges remarked that if the person who committed such a dastardly act was let off leniently, then there could be others who could commit similar acts.
Seeking confirmation of Mane's death sentence, public prosecutor Sandeep Shinde argued that as per Supreme Court judgements, dependency, poverty and age cannot be mitigating circumstances to award lesser punishment on the convict.
"Poverty and socio-economic psyche and adverse situations shall be considered if they play a major role in the commissions of the offence, otherwise it shall not be considered as mitigating circumstances," he argued.
While imposing the punishment, the courts should not only consider the circumstances of the accused, but also of the victims, Shinde contended.
Shinde also argued that the courts cannot ignore public outcry as people look up to the courts for justice.
The High Court, which had earlier upheld Mane's conviction, will continue to hear arguments on quantum of punishment tomorrow.
