CCI rejects complaint against ICICI Bank

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 25 2014 | 8:20 PM IST
Competition Commission has rejected allegations that private sector lender ICICI Bank indulged in unfair trade practices and abused its dominant position in the market by cheating its clients.
A complaint filed by Ohm Forex Services, a firm engaged in foreign exchange and remittance business under Money Transfer Service Scheme, had alleged that ICICI "embezzled" funds from it by charging commission ranging up to 0.99 paisa per dollar on all the transactions without its consent.
It was alleged that ICICI had "siphoned off" a sum of nearly Rs 26 lakh from the account of Ohm Forex.
Consequently, Ohm Forex alleged that such unilateral, arbitrary and illegal action of the bank "is unfair trade practice" and also abuse of their position of dominance".
In an order released today, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said that the alleged conduct by the bank took place between July 20, 2005 and April 8, 2007, which is "prior to the enforcement" of relevant provisions in the Competition Act.
"The alleged conduct being prior to the date of enforcement of section 3 or 4 cannot be examined by the Commission," CCI added.
Accordingly, the regulator said that it has "no prima facie case of contravention of the provisions of section 3 and 4 of the Act is made out against the opposite parties in the instant matter".
Sections 3 and 4 of the Act pertain to anti-competition agreement and abuse of dominant market position, respectively
Ohm had collaborated with First Remit that collected money throughout the world from the clients who want to send money to their relatives or friends in India for personal expenses. The money collected by the First Remit is distributed by Ohm Forex to the concerned customers.
The channel of transfer of funds from First Remit to Ohm Forex to the relatives/friends of the clients is through the bank, which receives money in British pound and US dollar, converts it in Indian rupee and credits the money to the account of Ohm Forex.
In 2005-06, Ohm Forex alleged to have faced lot of issues with First Remit on account of underfunding. It was stated that the funds sent by First Remit were far less than the amount of transaction paid by Ohm Forex.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 25 2014 | 8:20 PM IST

Next Story