"If you see something happening, who will respond? Delhi Police or a legislator? Delhi Police should get direct feed as it will do the real-time monitoring," a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva said after Delhi government and the police disagreed over sharing of the feed.
The police contended that policing was its preserve and the city government's offer to set up CCTVs was a "surreptitious Trojan horse" to "encroach" into its domain. It also refused to share the feed from the cameras with Delhi government.
The bench, thereafter, said the object behind setting up CCTVs was to strengthen safety and security.
It also said the police has also to be monitored to see whether it was doing its job, and sought a report from Delhi Police on whether cameras have been set up in police stations, especially those which cover 44 locations in the city identified as sensitive.
It observed that every inch of the capital cannot be covered by CCTVs, as it was a double edged sword of maintaining safety and security, but also giving rise to privacy concerns.
Police, the court observed that the government was "footballing" with the issue.
Referring to documents placed before it, the court observed that it appeared that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), which had cleared the priority proposals for inducting around 15000 more cops, "has been asked to step in line".
"Even the Cabinet note has been withdrawn. So it (proposals) has not even gone to the Cabinet. The proposals were cleared by MHA after several rounds of back and forth between MHA and Delhi Police. You (Finance Ministry) are again asking for functional justification. They (MHA) have already done it," the court added.
Meanwhile, Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) told the court that its one-stop crisis centres (OSCC) to provide assistance to victims of crime against women, have been set up in nine hospitals in the national capital.
The OSCC in district courts would be functional from April 1, 2016, DSLSA told the court and added that the standard operating procedures for these centres have been framed and the implementation is in progress.
The court was hearing a PIL initiated by it after the December 16, 2012 gangrape incident in which it has been giving directions on the issues of appointing more police personnel, setting up additional forensic labs and a victim compensation fund.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
