Centre not doing anything for revising pay of prosecutors: HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 15 2016 | 10:42 AM IST
The Delhi High Court has pulled up the Centre for "not doing anything" on the proposal sent by the AAP government for revision of pay scales of public prosecutors of the district courts here.
"You (Centre) are not doing anything on the proposal," Justice J R Midha said, adding the revised salaries are to be paid by the Delhi government then why the central government was not giving its go ahead to it.
"The manner in which the file is moving, shows that the Centre is not interested in doing anything," it said, adding the file was sent to the LG in September last year, after which it was sent to the President of India for his approval as the Delhi government does not have power to decide service related issues.
"This is a minor thing, You resolve it," the court advised Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain, who appeared for the Centre.
The Judge said he was "disturbed" after reading the file, as the Centre had put hundreds of objection in it, which was "not warranted".
The judge also asked why the Finance Ministry was sitting over the file since six months.
Delhi government counsel Rahul Mehra submitted that they had sent the cabinet note in December last to the LG approving hike in the salary of the prosecutors.
Mehra contended that the LG has put a stay on the proposal and sent it to the President on the ground that service matters do not lie in Delhi government's domain.
The court was hearing a petition filed through advocate Ashish Dixit seeking contempt action against Home Secretary for not complying with the court's September 9, 2015 order.
The contempt petition filed by Delhi Prosecutors Welfare
Association alleged "deliberate and willful disobedience" on the part of the Centre and city government in complying with the court order.
The association, in its petition, has said assurances to the court by Delhi government on providing Internet facilities to the prosecutors have also not been done.
"It is submitted that despite there being explicit directions by this court for implementing the cabinet decision dated September 1, 2015 the respondents (Centre and Delhi government) have till date not complied with the directions.
"The respondent 1 (Centre) and respondent 2 (Delhi government) have demonstrated an attitude which violates the majesty of this court. The respondents deliberately and willfully have not complied with the directions of this court," the petition has said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 15 2016 | 10:42 AM IST

Next Story