A piece of information revealed in a government environmental monitoring file has indirectly confirmed the existence of a new generation of Chinese ICBM, the Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) missile, a report on the website of state-run Global Times said.
Tang Bohu, a military commentator with Ifeng News, told the Daily that the confirmation of the existence of DF-41 missiles will give the international community, including the US, a new understanding of China's nuclear power.
"I believe revealing the information was unintentional. But sooner or later, China will demonstrate these new nuclear weapons at international military parades. Eventually, the weapons will be meant for deterrence," he said.
"The development pattern for our military industry is deploying one generation of weaponry, researching the next and forecasting a third. Now that the DF-31 missiles have long been in service, it is normal that research into the next generation is underway," he told the Global Times.
According to Jane's Defense Weekly, the DF-41 missiles are designed to have a range of 12,000 kilometres, putting it among the world's longest-range missiles.
"With proper master of the satellite launching and recovery technologies, one can send a warhead to any place around the globe, in theory," Song said.
"The next generation should be able to carry both nuclear and regular warheads that can perform accurate attacks."
Tang said it is widely speculated that the DF-41 missiles will be able to carry three nuclear warheads.
He said that the new generation were also likely to have better mobility as the launchers can cross more complicated terrain, and have better survivability in the event of a first strike.
Song noted that the new missiles would also have stronger penetration abilities and faster response times.
"Only with these advantages can they have the chance to quickly penetrate through the missile defence system of the US."
China has a "no first use" policy for nuclear weapons.
"The US has been building its missile defence network like a shield, which other countries' missiles cannot penetrate. This for sure stimulated other countries to sharpen their 'spears'.
"Otherwise, if the US has both the strongest shield and spear, they could impose an aggressive strategy on us, and we would be driven into passivity," Song said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
