'Cold War nuclear bomb tests help reveal true age of whale sharks'

Image
Press Trust of India Melbourne
Last Updated : Apr 06 2020 | 3:22 PM IST

Scientists have used data from atomic bomb tests conducted during the Cold War to correctly determine the age of whale sharks for the first time.

The research, published in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science, will help ensure the survival of the species which is classified as endangered.

Measuring the age of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) has been difficult because, like all sharks and rays, they lack bony structures called otoliths that are used to assess the age of other fish.

Whale shark vertebrae feature distinct bands -- a little like the rings of a tree trunk -- and it was known that these increased in number as the animal grew older.

However, some studies suggested that a new ring was formed every year, while others concluded that it happened every six months.

The researchers, including Mark Meekan from the Australian Institute of Marine Science, turned to the radioactive legacy of the Cold War's nuclear arms race.

During the 1950s and 1960s, the US, Soviet Union, Great Britain, France and China conducted tests of nuclear weapons.

Many of these were explosions detonated several kilometres in the air.

One powerful result of the blasts was the temporary atmospheric doubling of an isotope called carbon-14, a naturally occurring radioactive element that is often used by archaeologists and historians to date ancient bones and artefacts.

Its rate of decay is constant and easily measured, making it ideal for providing age estimates for anything over 300 years old.

Using bomb radiocarbon data, the researchers set about testing the carbon-14 levels in the growth rings of two long-dead whale sharks stored in Pakistan and Taiwan.

Measuring the radioisotope levels in successive growth rings allowed a clear determination of how often they were created -- and thus the age of the animal.

"We found that one growth ring was definitely deposited every year," Meekan said.

"This is very important, because if you over- or under-estimate growth rates you will inevitably end up with a management strategy that doesn't work, and you'll see the population crash," he said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 06 2020 | 3:22 PM IST

Next Story