"Gross injustice was done to the entire opposition parties" which were disallowed from participating in the discussion on Ishrat Jahan issue, Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge said amid protests from party members.
Read more from our special coverage on "ISHRAT JAHAN"
- Ishrat Jahan case: SC dismisses police officers plea for relief
- UPA conspired to defame ex-Gujarat CM Modi in Ishrat Jahan case: Rajnath Singh
- Congress trying to politicise issue of terror: Rajnath Singh on Ishrat Jahan
- Former Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde says no Ishrat file came to him
- Ishrat Jahan case: BJP cites role of Chidambaram, Manmohan Singh in changing affidavit
He said for want of the opposition's participation, the discussion was "biased" and saw "baseless" allegations against erstwhile UPA Government and its leadership and projected a "one-sided story".
"It was all a cooked-up story against the Congress and its leaders", he said, adding that party leader Veerappa Moily had sought permission to seek clarifications from the Home Minister Rajnath Singh, which was denied.
Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Pratap Rudy, however, dismissed the Congress charge. He said after a decision was taken in the business advisory committee that the issue would be taken up, it was for Congress members to give notice for participation, which was not done by them.
Speaker Sumitra Mahajan observed whatever the Minister has said was "correct".
Responding to clarifications, the Home Minister had yesterday accused erstwhile UPA government of hatching a "deep conspiracy" to frame Narendra Modi when he was the Gujarat Chief Minister.
He had also alleged that the previous regime had done a 'flip-flop' on the links of Ishrat Jahan with terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Without naming P Chidambaram, Singh had charged the then Home Minister with giving "colour" to terrorism by coining the term 'saffron terror'.
The Home Minister had insisted that the recent statement by Pakistani-American terrorist David Headley before a Mumbai court only reaffirmed the first affidavit filed by the UPA government on August 6, 2009 before the Gujarat High Court that Ishrat had links with LeT.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)