Convict who gave arms to Dutt challenges remission in sentence

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 15 2016 | 6:22 PM IST
A convict in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case -- who had carried weapons to the house of actor Sanjay Dutt along with co-accused prior to the explosions in furtherance of conspiracy -- has moved the Bombay High Court challenging cancellation of remission in sentence awarded to him.
Ibrahim Moosa Chauhan alias Baba Chauhan was initially granted remission in his 10-year sentence on account of good conduct and was to be released from prison in November 2015.
However, his remission was cancelled by Inspector General (prisons) recently, says the petition. Aggrieved, he moved the high court.
Dutt was also sentenced to five years imprisonment by a TADA court and is due to be released from jail next month. His jail term was reduced by 18 months on account of his good behaviour and work done by him in prison.
The actor has already spent around three-and-a-half years in jail.
Chauhan pleaded he was similarly placed like Dutt and had displayed good behaviour in prison like the actor. He, therefore, should be given the same facility of remission on the lines of the remission granted to Dutt.
The petition is slated to come up for hearing on January 22 before Acting Chief Justice V K Tahilramani.
Chauhan, in his petition filed through lawyer Farhana Shah, claimed that the Inspector General (Prisons) had cancelled the remission granted to him "without applying his mind and with a malafide intention."
Chauhan argued that he was pinned down only because he is a bomb blast convict.
Chauhan's petition said that he was assigned the work of gardening, cleaning toilets and water tanks in Nashik jail.
He accumulated remission on account of good work and behaviour. It was only because of his good conduct that he was granted 80 days special remission.
However, when he returned to jail after his parole expired on November 24, he was informed in a letter that his special remission had been cancelled, said Chauhan's petition.
Chauhan pleaded that the order cancelling his remission be
set aside but it was not considered by the authorities.
According to prosecution in 1993 bomb blast case, Chauhan had visited Dutt's house along with gangster Abu Salem and others on January 15, 1993 and informed him that they would deliver weapons the next day.
Arms were delivered at Dutt's house and taken away later, except an AK-47 rifle which was found in possession of the actor for which he was convicted.
Arms and ammunition were used in the serial blasts in which 257 people were killed and over 700 injured.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 15 2016 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story