'Coop society employees should be regarded as public servants'

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Nov 19 2014 | 8:05 PM IST
: Setting aside a single judge's order, Madras High Court has ruled that Cooperative society employees should be regarded as public servants and be brought under the Prevention of Corruption Act, in view of rampant corruption among them.
"It is evident that corrupt practices indulged by public servant" is alarming and courts are bound to widen the scope of interpretation of the words public servant," a division bench comprising Justices N Paul Vasanthakumar and P R Shivakumar said in its order yesterday.
The matter relates to a cane officer of Perambalur Sugar Mills, posted at Tiruthani Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited who was arrested in March 2009 on charges of demanding and accepting bribe from his subordinate for a transfer.
He was immediately suspended. But he was reinstated and retired too, after a single judge declared he was not a public servant and so could not be made to face PC Act proceedings.
The mill then moved court.
Advocate General A L Somayaji said sugar mill staff are common cadre employees as per Government Orders and their salaries are fixed by the government.These mills do public duty
and, therefore, its employees are public servants, he said.
Concurring with his submissions, the bench said "any person who is an office-bearer or an employee of educational, scientific, social, cultural or other institution, whatever manner would be, receiving or having received any financial assistance from the central or any state government, or local or other public authority, will come under the definition of public servant."
Noting that governments had "deep and perverse control" over sugar mills, whose staff were performing public duty, the judges said it was beyond doubt that the mills and its workers are performing public duty like private aided/unaided recognised educational institutions, coming within the definition of Sec 2(c)(viii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Setting aside the single judge order,the bench then asked Tiruvallur Chief Judicial Magistrate to dispose of the case, pending for four years now, within two months and send a report to the high court registry.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 19 2014 | 8:05 PM IST

Next Story