Court allows police to investigate case against man for allegedly publishing false info on EVM

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 25 2020 | 2:30 PM IST

A Delhi court on Saturday allowed police to investigate a case against a man who shared allegedly false information on social media, claiming that EVM/VVPAT machines brought to give demo in his area ahead of the assembly elections were not showing correct vote count result.

Metropolitan Magistrate Abhilash Malhotra gave permission to the Station House Officer (SHO) of Sabzi Mandi Police Station to investigate the case against a Delhi-resident who allegedly posted a video, claiming that the voting machine was not showing correct results.

The police approached the court seeking permission for investigation as the case was registered for non-cognisable offences.

According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, no police officer shall investigate a non-cognisable case without the order of a magistrate having power to try such case or commit the case for trial.

The case was registered on the complaint of Shammi Kumar, a junior assistant at a polling centre at Timarpur in Delhi.

In his complaint, Kumar said that he was on election duty and giving a demo of EVM/VVPAT machines for raising awareness among voters ahead of the assembly elections.

The accused cast three votes and found that the total vote count was five, following which he raised objection against the difference in vote count, the complaint said.

He recorded a video of the incident too, it said.

The complainant said that he tried to explain to the man that two other people had taken a demo before him and hence the voting machine showed that five votes.

Kumar gave Pandit a demo of the machine again and showed him the same number of votes cast by him, the complaint said.

It alleged that despite this, Pandit posted the video on social media claiming that EVM/VVAPT was not showing the correct vote count result.

Kumar then registered a case with the police for non-cognisable offences under section 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 177 (furnishing false information) and 505 (1) (publishing statement, rumour or report) of the India Penal Code (IPC).

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 25 2020 | 2:30 PM IST

Next Story