Court refuses to quash case against man for molesting tenant

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 23 2017 | 4:28 PM IST
A court here has refused to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of molesting and assaulting his tenant and her friend when they refused to vacate his house.
Additional Sessions Judge A K Kuhar said "prima facie offences were made out" against the man, a south Delhi resident, as at the stage of framing of charge oral statements of witnesses cannot be ignored.
"At the stage of framing of charge, when prima facie case is made out, oral statement of witnesses cannot be ignored. Therefore, a charge under section 354 (molestation) of IPC is prima facie made out against the revisionist(accused)," the judge said while disposing of the revision petition of the accused against framing of charges.
In his plea, the man contended that the magisterial court mechanically passed the order without considering that a video clipping allegedly showing the man molest the two, recorded by the woman's brother, was not submitted before it.
However, the court rejected this contention, saying "if any video clippings of the incident has not been placed on record, the revisionist can draw the advantage of the same during the trial".
According to the complaint, on August 27, 2015 the landlord enteredintotheflatofthe complainant, started hurling abuses at heraswellasherfriend, and threw their belongingsoutsidethehouse.
The complainant's brother, who was also present there, was alsoabusedwhile the two women were pushedandslapped by the accused, it said.
An FIR was lodged against him for the offences including those punishable under sections 354 (molestation), 448(house- trespass), 452(house-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) of the IPC.
The court noted that the allegations against the accused were "very categorical" in the statement that complainant has been hit by him and when her friend tried to save her, she was also treated similarly.
It, however, said that the veracity of these allegations could be tested during the trial when these witnesses will be examined in the court.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 23 2017 | 4:28 PM IST

Next Story