Court restrains media from reporting names, addresses of Unnao rape survivor, family & witnesses

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 07 2019 | 9:20 PM IST

A Delhi court Wednesday directed the media to abstain from reporting names and address of the Unnao rape survivor, her family and witnesses and certain other aspects of the case.

District Judge Dharmesh Sharma issued a slew of guidelines on media reporting including restraining it from reporting on testimonies of witnesses and merits of the case.

The court said the trial has to be completed within 45-day deadline set by the Supreme Court and declined the plea of CBI seeking 30 days to complete the investigation by saying that it has to be done by August 17.

During the proceedings, senior Public Prosecutor Ashok Bhartendu, appearing for CBI, said the statement of the rape survivor, recorded by the court, should be relied upon in this case and the accused persons should be put on trial.

The CBI's contention was supported by advocate Dharmendra Kumar Mishra and advocate and general secretary of Pragatisheel Mahila Sanghathan, Poonam Kaushik, the counsel of the victim and her family.

Opposing CBI's contentions, advocate Tanvir Ahmed Mir, appearing for the accused -- expelled BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar -- said the allegations were "false" and "motivated".

He claimed the allegations were a result of "prior animosity" between the families of Sengar and the survivor.

While issuing directions for the media, the court said it will make appropriate decision at a later stage on holding "in-camera" proceedings.

The court said however that for the time being, media will not cover and exclude part of the proceedings as and when any specific directions are passed by the court during course of inquiry/ trial as the case may be.

"The media shall refrain from reporting testimony of any witness, wholly or partly, and refrain from appreciating such evidence or giving any opinion on the merits of the case during the course of this enquiry/ trial as the case may be," it said.

The court further said media persons will not record the proceedings in audio-video mode inside or outside the courtroom.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 07 2019 | 9:20 PM IST

Next Story