Courts should find ways to handle arbitration cases fast: Prez

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 21 2016 | 9:42 PM IST
Calling for institutional reforms to strengthen arbitration framework in India, President Pranab Mukherjee today said courts need to devise a mechanism to handle such matters separately and avoid delays arising from judicial intervention.
"Judges have the delicate task of maintaining the balance between interference and over-interference. Indian Courts need to devise an administrative mechanism to ensure that arbitration matters are handled separately and efficiently so as to avoid any delay arising out of the judicial intervention," he said.
Addressing conference on 'Strengthening Arbitration and Enforcement in India', he said State intervention in a market economy should be limited to a situation of market failure and private commercial disputes do not fall under that category.
The government must create an enabling framework for institutional arbitrations in India, Mukherjee said.
Stating that India has the basic physical infrastructure to support international arbitration, he said, India needs "basic institutional reform to strengthen arbitration framework."
"Goods laws themselves cannot substitute the need for good institutions," he said, adding arbitral institutions, judiciary and the government are critical for strengthening arbitration structure in India.
While arbitration is an alternative to the judiciary, it cannot function without support from judiciary either, Mukherjee said
Mukherjee said arbitral institutions help to facilitate the core advantage of arbitration but unlike advanced economies, institutional arbitration is still not widespread in India.
"Adhoc arbitration is the norm," he said. "Although, arbitral institutions have come up, there is huge untapped potential for growth of institutional arbitration in India for which both domestic and international arbitral institutions have to play a proactive role in getting this market."
Emphasising that state intervention in a market economy should be limited to a situation of market failure, he defined such a scenario as where the market left to itself cannot work out a solution.
"Private commercial disputes are not market failures by themselves. They can be resolved by the private parties on their own and business will continue.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 21 2016 | 9:42 PM IST

Next Story