DDCA against appointment of administrator for Sept matches

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 22 2016 | 7:07 PM IST
The Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) today opposed in Delhi High Court the appointment of an administrator to oversee cricket matches to be held in September at Ferozshah Kotla stadium here.
The submission was made by DDCA's lawyer who also told a bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Deepa Sharma that the cricketing body has accepted the recommendations of Justice Mukul Mudgal regarding its functioning.
Advocate Nitin Mishra, representing Justice Mudgal, told the court that the retired judge does not wish to continue as observer of DDCA as he has other commitments.
Mishra said if the court requests, then Justice Mudgal would continue in the position and added that in such a situation, the judge should be allowed to constitute a 3-5 member team who would assist him in discharging his mandate.
The court said Justice Mudgal should continue in the post till some alternative arrangments were made or till a final solution was arrived at and allowed his request to set up the team, saying he "can seek assistance of individuals he deems fit for the purpose".
"He should at least stay on till September 15 (when the domestic matches would be held at the stadium)," it said.
Meanwhile, an application through advocate Rohit Gandhi was moved by eight directors, including Vice President Chetan Chauhan and Treasurer Ravinder Manchanda, of DDCA seeking implementation of the recommendations of Justice Mudgal.
The bench said it will not go into the matter today and listed it for hearing on September 22, when it commences hearing on three issues - firstly, whether an administrator needs to be appointed and who; secondly, arguments in support and against the Mudgal committee report and finally, what survives in the petition before it.
The court was hearing DDCA's 2010 plea for an occupancy certificate from South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to hold matches at the stadium.
SDMC in March this year had issued the certificate saying it was fully satisfied that the deviations in the stadium's structure have been rectified by the association in terms of the sanctioned plan of 2005.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 22 2016 | 7:07 PM IST

Next Story